Skip Navigation
5-8-2007
 

Alaska Same-Sex Benefits Issue Tabled For Now

 

The Alaska state House on Monday denied voters the chance to decide whether the state should offer benefits to same-sex partners of state employees, the Anchorage Daily News reported.

In 2006, the Alaska Supreme Court mandated that the state provide the benefits – despite the fact that in 1998, voters overwhelmingly passed a constitutional amendment to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman.

Jim Minnery, executive director of the Alaska Family Council, said the House is out of step with a majority of voters.

"The legislators who voted 'No' simply ignored the will of the majority of Alaskans who said very clearly on April 3rd that they wanted this issue to be given back to the people," Minnery told CitizenLink. "For those of us who believe the institution of marriage should receive unique privileges and recognition, it was disappointing."

He applauded the lawmakers who voted for a proposed ballot measure.

"I'm grateful to the 22 House members who did the right thing," Minnery said. "The Alaska Family Council will continue to work with legislators to address the Alaska Supreme Court's misguided ruling mandating that unmarried homosexual and lesbian partners of public employees be treated just as if they were married."


Share on Facebook

If you enjoy reading stories like this one, sign up for the free CitizenLink Daily Update e-mail. You'll get news and commentary from Focus on the Family Action delivered right to your computer.

Citizen Magazine
 

Citizen Magazine

Citizen gives you information no one else offers—stories that set the record straight on the issues that affect your family, your neighborhood, and your church—plus stories of local heroes who've overcome great odds (and their own fears) and stood up for the values you cherish, along with practical steps that help you make a difference.

Subscribe to Citizen