Skip Navigation
9-26-2003
 

House Gets Bill to Fight Judicial Tyranny

 

Rep. Chip Pickering, R-Miss., introduces Safeguarding Our Religious Liberties Act to restrict federal courts from ruling on Commandments, Pledge and national motto.

The fight against judicial tyranny picked up steam Thursday when a bill was introduced in the House of Representatives to prohibit federal courts from ruling on constitutional challenges to the display of the Ten Commandments, recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance and the mere existence of the national motto.

U.S. Rep. Chip Pickering, R-Miss., is the chief sponsor of the Safeguarding Our Religious Liberties Act, the mirror image of a Senate bill introduced this summer by Sen. Wayne Allard, R-Colo. Both bills point to Article III, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution as the authority for taking certain matters out of the hands of federal courts (at least those below the Supreme Court) and reserving them as matters for individual states to decide.

Pickering's bill, H.R. 3190, is the fifth piece of legislation to seek, in some fashion, to limit the power of the judiciary to have the final say on certain issues of religious liberty. Amanda Izsak, federal issues analyst at Focus on the Family, said Pickering's bill and Allard's — S. 1558, the Religious Liberty Restoration Act — are the best of the bunch.

"They are the strongest and most comprehensive, stripping federal courts from the Pledge, 'In God We Trust' and the Ten Commandments," Izsak said. "No other bill addresses all three of these important religious-liberty issues."

The fact that a form of the legislation has now been introduced into each chamber of Congress, she added, "demonstrates real commitment from legislators and gives the legislation a great chance of success."

"This is wonderful news for the millions of Americans who want their religious liberties protected. This bill will halt our runaway judiciary and place fair limits on the breadth of their power."

In asking Congress to apply Article III, Section 2, the bills seek nothing that the House and Senate haven't done routinely throughout history — and more than a dozen times during the 107th Congress.

In the 2002 Senate appropriations bill for funds to fight the war on terror, for instance, language protecting the Black Hills National Forest in South Dakota from certain environmental restrictions included this note: "Any actions authorized by this section shall not be subject to judicial review by any court of the United States." The author of that language? None other than famously liberal South Dakota Democrat Tom Daschle.

Among the other laws passed that invoked Article III, Section 2 powers were the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act, the American Servicemembers Protection Act of 2002, the Aviation Security Act and even a law to expedite construction of a World War II memorial in Washington, D.C.

TAKE ACTION/FOR MORE INFORMATION
To learn more about the Safeguarding Our Religious Liberties Act and other bills to rein in the federal judiciary, visit Focus on the Family's "Stop Judicial Tyranny" Web site.


Share on Facebook
Post to MySpace


If you enjoy reading stories like this one, sign up for the free CitizenLink Daily Update e-mail. You'll get news and commentary from Focus on the Family Action delivered right to your computer.

To view this video, please enable JavaScript.

Share More Videos

Citizen Magazine
 

Citizen Magazine

Citizen gives you information no one else offers—stories that set the record straight on the issues that affect your family, your neighborhood, and your church—plus stories of local heroes who've overcome great odds (and their own fears) and stood up for the values you cherish, along with practical steps that help you make a difference.

Subscribe to Citizen