Skip Navigation
11-4-09
 

Amendment to Health-Care Bill Would Undercut Pro-Life Proposal

 

U.S. Rep. Brad Ellsworth, D-Ind., who has a consistent pro-life voting record, reportedly has proposed an amendment to the House health-care reform bill that would undercut a pro-life amendment to the bill.
 
"(The) proposed language will allow the new federal government insurance program — the 'public option' — to pay for abortion on demand," said Douglas Johnson, legislative director for the National Right to Life Committee. "The pro-abortion House Democratic leadership is using Ellsworth's phony language to undercut the real pro-life amendment, proposed by Reps. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., and Joe Pitts, R-Pa."

The Stupak-Pitts Amendment would prohibit federal funding of abortion except in rare cases. If the Democrat leadership refuses to allow the amendment to be offered, Stupak and 40 other Democrats have pledged to prevent the health-care bill from coming to the floor for a vote.

TAKE ACTION
Ask your representative and senators to vote against the Rule on debate unless House leadership allows a vote on the Stupak-Pitts amendment.


 



If you enjoy reading stories like this one, sign up for the free CitizenLink Daily Update e-mail. You'll get news and commentary from Focus on the Family Action delivered right to your computer.

To view this video, please enable JavaScript.

Share More Videos

Citizen Magazine
 

Citizen Magazine

Citizen gives you information no one else offers—stories that set the record straight on the issues that affect your family, your neighborhood, and your church—plus stories of local heroes who've overcome great odds (and their own fears) and stood up for the values you cherish, along with practical steps that help you make a difference.

Subscribe to Citizen