One of the fastest paced and most contentious areas of medical research today centers around the use of existing human embryos and possible creation of new embryos for stem cell research. While at first these topics may appear to too complex for non-scientists to grapple with, the basic biology is relatively simple and the ethical questions demand consideration by all people of faith, regardless of their scientific knowledge.
What's the truth behind the appealing egg donation ads?
Stem cell research will continue to be debated in halls of Congress but unfortunately, political decisions might not line up with sound science.
As stem cell research continues to be an issue debated in the public square, scientists are discovering ethical alternatives through the use of adult cells.
Recent breakthroughs in ethical research are making embryonic stem cells a thing of the past.
Pro-life women took their families to Washington, D.C., to show congressional liberals that frozen embryos are human after all.
The debate over stem cell research is raging across the nation and echoing through chambers of Congress and state legislatures. Most people have heard just enough to offer an opinion to friends and neighbors. Every new study on embryonic stem cells produces an onslaught of optimistic articles confidently proclaiming that with just a little more time and a lot more public money embryonic stem cells will provide cures for dozens of diseases and hope for millions of sick patients. Meanwhile, stories promoting adult stem cells seem to be less optimistic and much less prominent. Casual observers might reasonably conclude that embryonic stem cells hold the most promise while adult stem cells are of secondary interest. They would be wrong.
Dr. William Hurlbut has proposed a new human cloning process described as “altered nuclear transfer” that would create “non-embryos” that contain embryonic stem cells. The proposal involves human cloning and genetic modification to create genetically disabled “embryos” that cannot develop past the blastocyst stage. These “embryos” would then be destroyed for their stem cells.
Family, friends and millions of fans grieved the October 10, 2004 death of actor, director and spinal-cord research advocate Christopher Reeve. Reeve ardently supported embryonic stem cell research. Mark Pickup, on the other hand, is willing to turn his back on research that might help him walk again if it comes at the expense of another human life, a conviction that makes him a different kind of superman — a superman for life.
Note: Some of these resources refer to sites not produced by FOF. These are for informational purposes only and do not constitute an endorsement.