God casts His vision for the sexes in the opening pages of Scripture.
As Christians, we know from the creation account in Genesis 1 that God creates by “calling forth” by His spoken word (“Let there be…”). We also learn that His creation and ordering of the world involved a series of “separations.” These separations include heaven and earth, light and dark, day and night, morning and evening, clouds and seas, water and dry land, and sun and moon. Profoundly, the Hebrew concept of “separation” is rooted in the word kadosh, which – while often rendered as “holy” in English – here carries the sense of being “set apart” (separated) unto the Lord. Thus, in this series of separations, we see a consecrated and holy ordering, which at its essence reflects a “setting apart” unto the Creator God of the Universe.
Out of this paradigm, the creation account further delineates a distinct separateness for plants and then seasons, followed by all manner of living creatures found in the seas, on land and in the air. Finally, in the 26th verse, we see the pinnacle of God’s creation – mankind – called forth into being. Specifically, in humans we see not only a separation from the animals, but also a separation of mankind into two sexes – male and female – wholly complementary, yet each uniquely and mysteriously bearing God’s image – the imago Dei. It is in this bearing of God’s image as male and female that we humans are called to make visible the invisible Creator God on this planet.
Thus, it is out of the diversity and distinctive separateness of male and female that we humans are called to not only represent God in the proper and ordered stewardship of His good and wonderful creation, but to come together in unity and be joined as “one flesh”[1] in order to bring forth new life that will also somehow look like God and bear the imago Dei.
As it was from the beginning, so it is to this very day.
“Transgenderism” calls forth chaos out of order
In contrast to this divinely ordered vision for human gender and sexual expression, today we in the West are confronted by a spirit of “transgender” activism – flowing out of the gay rights movement – that says gender no longer matters, that the distinctives of male and female are merely social constructs and that the sexes are interchangeable. Ironically, while these activists argue that a homosexual orientation is fixed and immutable, they incoherently claim that gender is “fluid” and changeable. For example, Caitlin Ryan, a gay activist, clinical social worker and researcher at San Francisco State University recently said:
“I think the fluidity of gender is the next big wave in terms of adolescent development… Gender has become part of the defining way that youth organize themselves and rebel against adults.”- Caitlin Ryan[2]
In short, a profound deconstruction of gender is taking place within every arena of society that undermines the fundamental order established by God Himself – reflecting the very essence of who He is and who we were created to be. And when God’s order is deconstructed and then necessarily redefined, the consequences for gender, sexuality, marriage, family, and ultimately society are profound and far-reaching.
Some examples:
Adding the “T” to GLB
For decades, gay activist leaders worked hard to keep those who called themselves “transgender” or “transsexual” as far out of the public eye as possible. By their own admission, the last thing they wanted was a bunch of “drag queens” and cross-dressers to scare away potential allies and ruin any hope for their community to achieve its political goals. So the activists only portrayed homosexuals in favorable and non-threatening ways.
But recent years have seen a sea-change in attitudes about cultural acceptance of homosexuality. And gay activists now believe that sufficient political gains have been won at the local, state and federal levels that they can now turn their attention to adding the “T” – for Transgender – to the GLB (Gay-Lesbian-Bisexual) acronym that represents their community.
So today, at every level of government, we are seeing the “GLBT” community press hard to add the “transgender” category to existing laws. While the initial goal of gay activists was to add “sexual orientation” to laws and to normalize homosexuality and bisexuality across every arena of society, the goal now is to add “gender identity or expression” to laws and to normalize “transgenderism.” Presently this is happening with the various forms of hate crimes and employment nondiscrimination laws at both the state and federal levels.
Of particular concern when it comes to the creation of protected class status for “sexual minorities” through hate crimes and employment nondiscrimination laws is the sobering reality that, in increasingly secular societies, when “gay rights” collides with religious liberties, religious freedom nearly always loses. Recent events in not only the United States, but in Canada, the United Kingdom, and Sweden clearly demonstrate that the cultural battles over the normalization of homosexuality are a zero-sum game – gains afforded to one group will necessarily come at the expense of another. Specifically, those who hold to a biblically orthodox view on homosexual or transgender behavior will increasingly find their voices marginalized and then eventually banned from the public arena.[13]
Christian clarity in the midst of confusion
Standing for truth in love and compassion
Talking points on God’s created intent for the sexes and “transgenderism”
· Attempts to subjugate objective biblical truths to subjective human experiences lead men and women to accept lies. Those with a personal interest in the pro-transgender theology often twist the Scriptures in ways that defy logic and common sense to support their behavior.
For Further Study
Keyword search: transgender
Resources
Help 4 Families
P.O. Box 1225
Bradford, PA 16701
(814) 5984952
[1] Genesis 2:23-24; Matthew 19: 3 – 6; Mark 10: 6-9; Ephesians 5:28-32 New International Version.
[2] Associated Press“Youth Culture Testing the Boundaries of Gender Identity and Roles,” The Advocate Online, 4 October 2005, <http://www.advocate.com/news_detail_ektid21307.asp>, (7 October 2008).
[3] “Mistakes in God’s Factory,” 26 January 2007, Spiegel Online, <http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,druck-462516,00.html,> (29 September 2008).
[4] Laura Clark, “Don't Say Mum and Dad... teachers told not to assume pupils have heterosexual parents,” 30 January 2008, Mail Online, < http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-511209/Dont-say-mum-dad--teachers-told-assume-pupils-heterosexual-parents.html#> (29 September 2008); Safe to Learn: Embedding Anti-Bullying Work in Schools - Preventing and Responding to Homophobic bullying in schools, Teachernet Online Publications for Schools, September 2007.
< http://publications.teachernet.gov.uk/eOrderingDownload/HOMOPHOBIC%20BULLYING.pdf > (30 September 2008).
[5] Paul Brooks, “Principal Undergoing Sex Change,” Times Herald-Record Online, 25 August 2007, < http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070825/NEWS/708250334 > (30 September 2008).
[6] See, for instance, Pagan Kennedy, “Q & A with Norman Spack,” The Boston Globe Online, 30 March 2008, <http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2008/03/30/qa_with_norman_spack/> (7 October 2008); or J. Michael Bailey, The Man Who Would Be Queen, (Washington DC: Joseph Henry Press, 2003), pp. 26-28.
[7] See, for example, Gender Public Advocacy Coalition’s “2008 Genius Index,” which noted a large increase in college campuses offering “gender neutral” housing and restrooms, <http://www.gpac.org/cata/news.html?cmd=view&archive=news&msgnum=0725 > (30 September 2008) and groups like “Safe2Pee,” which map gender-neutral bathrooms around the world, <http://www.safe2pee.org/beta/> (30 September 2008).
[8] Associated Press, “Cross-Dressing Students Get 'Transvestite Toilet' at Thai School,” Fox News online, 18 June 1008, <http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,368301,00.html > (26 September 2008).
[9] Sheila Marikar, "America's Next Transgender Top Model?" 22 August 2008, ABC News online, <http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/Story?id=5629177&page=1> (30 September 2008).
[10] SB 777, Official California Legislative Information, 12 October 2007, <http://leginfo.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0751-0800/sb_777_bill_20071012_chaptered.pdf > (30 September 2008).
[11] Patricia Leagh Brown, “Supporting Boys or Girls When the Line Isn’t Clear,” New York Times online, 2 December, 2006, <http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/02/us/02child.html?pagewanted=all > (3 October 2008).
[12] “California Transgender Student Allowed to Run For Prom King,” Fox News online, 22 April, 2007, <http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,267543,00.html > (3 October 2008).
[13] See, as examples, Thomas M. Messner, “Executive Summary: Same-Sex Marriage and the Threat to Religious Liberty,” 30 Octrober 2008, The Heritage Foundation, http://www.heritage.org/Research/Family/bg2201es.cfm; Barbara Bradley Hagerty, “Gay Rights, Religious Liberties: A Three-Act Story,” 16 June 2008, National Public Radio, http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=91486340; Chai R. Feldblum, “Moral Conflict and Liberty: Gay Rights and Religion,” http://www.becketfund.org/files/4bce5.pdf?PHPSESSID=bdc567ff4c9c91f54a125a72954fcd4erF;
If you enjoy reading stories like this one, sign up for the free CitizenLink Daily Update e-mail. You'll get news and commentary from Focus on the Family Action delivered right to your computer.