Skip Navigation
 

How is the Department of Justice bottleneck hurting the war on porn?

 

Legal roadblocks to fighting indecency

The Supreme Court has ruled that individual communities must use a jury trial to determine whether pornographic material violates obscenity standards.  It's a difficult test because no one really knows whether a crime has been committed until the verdict is delivered.  Nevertheless, it's been the system for the past 35 years and has allowed many communities to get rid of hardcore pornography.

The system breaks down, however, when law enforcement agencies at the state, local, or federal level do not enforce obscenity laws.  If a business suspected of violating the law is not investigated, cases cannot be brought to trial.  If cases don't go to trial, a community has no opportunity to exercise its constitutional right to determine its own standards. 

The absence of effective enforcement favors criminals and lowers community standards, because material is presumed to be legal unless proved otherwise in a court of law.  What we see across the nation today are communities held hostage by pornographers and by reluctant law agencies ignoring the needs of those they have sworn to serve. 



If you enjoy reading stories like this one, sign up for the free CitizenLink Daily Update e-mail. You'll get news and commentary from Focus on the Family Action delivered right to your computer.

Citizen Magazine
 

Citizen Magazine

Citizen gives you information no one else offers—stories that set the record straight on the issues that affect your family, your neighborhood, and your church—plus stories of local heroes who've overcome great odds (and their own fears) and stood up for the values you cherish, along with practical steps that help you make a difference.

Subscribe to Citizen